Henry’s favourite place to play is in the farmyard at Lino’s, about 100 metres behind our house. It’s got it all: chickens, rabbits, belligerent geese, a whole array of farm implements, and, most importantly, the tractor. Henry loves to feed the rabbits by pushing grass through the mesh of their cage – for a long time he was convinced that all animals were herbivores and would try to force-feed grass to the dog.
The other day when we walked up to the farmyard Lino and Gianna had just killed three rabbits. The bodies were strung up on a line by their back legs, socks and gloves still on but otherwise skinned, and Gianna was in the middle of gutting them.
I hesitated. Should I accompany Henry (not yet two years old) so he can see what they were doing (this was Henry’s preference) or should we turn around and leave the blood and gore for another day? Clearly Henry’s not going to grasp the intricacies of the killing that’s just taken place. But he’s aware enough to start piecing together the connection between the rabbits in the cages and those bodies on the line. Would this be inappropriate at his age?
Following my initial instinct, I took him over and we watched Lino and Gianna work. Henry, only mildly interested, lasted a minute or two before the tractor called him away.
I didn’t think about that episode again until a few days ago when I saw a discussion on Greenpa’s blog about the right age at which to teach children about the connection between death and meat. One commenter felt strongly that 12 was the minimum age, which seems a gross underestimation of children’s powers of understanding the world. Greenpa’s son reckons it’s never too early. There was a parallel conversation going on at No Impact Man.
The entire debate is a luxury: we can pay to be disassociated from the production of our food. In my experience, where families are directly involved in the killing of their own food you’ll find children exposed to the slaughter of animals from the earliest age. Is Henry more delicate than children in rural Asia or Africa?
So what’s the answer for Tessa, Henry, and me? I think it’s never too early to make the connection between animals and the meat on your plate. Or vegetables for that matter (as Cathie points out on Becoming Domestic, the best way to get kids to like vegetables is to get them involved growing them).
However, actually witnessing the slaughter is another thing and will have to wait until Henry is old enough to discuss his feelings before, during, and after the event. While it will depend on partly on how Henry develops, I’ve got a rough figure of 8 years old in my head. One thing is certain – if we stay in Marche there won’t be any shortage of opportunities for teaching him: in a rural area like this death is pretty common, but that’s no bad thing.


9 comments
Comments feed for this article
23 July, 2007 at 18:12
sunnyboydevlin
8? I would certainly agree that waiting until he can express his opinion or feelings is a good idea, but I suspect that this may happen much sooner than you think…We have certainly already had similiar discussions with Fin, although it is fair to say that his relationship with the animals in question was less concrete. He was 5 at the time.
Just after his 5th birthday we went mackerel fishing off a boat. Caught a few and we had to stun and kill them. Fin was fascinated. He had no squeamish-ness about eating them from the bbq either. indeed, one of his favorite past-times is table football with fish eyes. Perhaps not being furry Protecting our children is not the same as maintaining their ignorance/innocence.
Well done for going with it.
24 July, 2007 at 7:55
sunnyboydevlin
Perhaps not being furry made a great deal of difference to the way Fin perceived the death of the fish.
30 July, 2007 at 5:46
mom
How old were you, Casey, when you saw the pig slaughtered at the Farm School?…I think around 5 or younger.
30 July, 2007 at 9:48
Casey
I saw a pig slaughtered at farm school?
31 July, 2007 at 7:46
sunnyboydevlin
maybe thats why you are such a devout vegan now?
31 July, 2007 at 9:39
Casey
It must have been really traumatic. I’d totally blocked it out – so effectively that many of my favourite foods are pork based: prosciutto, ciauscolo, salami…
Thinking about it, if I did see a pig slaughtered when I was five it doesn’t seem to have done me much harm (sample size of one – no control group). But on the other hand, it hasn’t done me much good either as I don’t remember it. So maybe this backs up the view that earlier is better to expose Henry to the details of where his meat comes from: he’ll understand as much as he’s capable of understanding at whatever age he happens to be. I’m tending towards age 5-6 now – provided he’s developed enough to discuss his feelings and reaction.
31 July, 2007 at 17:11
sunnyboydevlin
btw..what else do they teach you at Farm School? how to look good is chequered shirts? and How to chew on a blade of grass? I wanna a piece of that action.
2 August, 2007 at 1:21
John Cole
When kids see things, they will have a question if they have one and they will share it. Henry looked at the activity and for whatever reason, had no question and was ready to move on. Who knows what he “saw” but it did not register enough to generate a question so why push the issue. Sex ed is the same. Questions come up and need to be answered. You don’t respond to the question of what time is it with an explanation of how a watch is built and works. Answer what they want and move on. They will have more questions tomorrow and in the case of the rabbits, I bet it is before 8 yrs old. He will tell you when he is ready to discuss it.
10 August, 2007 at 17:00
Laura
“Questions come up and need to be answered. You don’t respond to the question of what time is it with an explanation of how a watch is built and works. Answer what they want and move on. They will have more questions tomorrow…”
Spot on. :)